Kikvidze, Zaal და Suzuki, Maki და Brooker, Rob
Conceptualizing importance: response to Freckleton and Rees.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution.
ISSN Cell Press
რეზიუმე
Freckleton and Rees make three major critical points on our recent paper in TREE: (i) we highlight Cimp, which is a flawed index of competition; (ii) we incorrectly dismiss previous measures of competition as ‘binary tests’; (iii) the question of ‘importance’ of competition depends on the context in which it is being examined, and the measure used should be driven by the question asked. We disagree.
ამ მასალაზე ხელმისაწვდომი ვერსია
-
Conceptualizing importance: response to Freckleton and Rees. (deposited 23 იანვარი 2014 19:22)
[ასახულია მიმდინარე დროს]
Actions (login required)
![ობიექტის ნახვა ობიექტის ნახვა](/style/images/action_view.png) |
ობიექტის ნახვა |