Brooker, Rob and Callaway, Ray and Cavieres, Lohen and Kikvidze, Zaal and Lortie, Chris and Michalet, Richared and Pugnaire, Francisco and Valiente-Banuet, Alfonso and Whitham, Thomas (2009) Don’t diss integration: a comment on Ricklefs’s disintegrating communities. American Naturalist, 174. pp. 919-927.
This is the latest version of this item.
|
Text
Brooker et al 2009 Am Nat.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Ricklefs’s recent call to investigate ecological processes at large scales helps focus ecologists’ attention on an undoubtedly important topic. However, we believe that some of his accompanying arguments for the primacy of such work and, in particular, for the need to “disintegrate” the local community concept are flawed. We revisit Ricklefs’s main tenets and demonstrate that research on local communities is a vital part of understanding processes and diversity across a range of spatial and temporal scales. The integration of research across spatial scales expands our horizons and understanding of ecology and evolution, and this should not be unnecessarily constrained to one extreme or the other.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Q Science > Ecology |
Divisions: | Institutes > 4D Research Institute |
Depositing User: | Prof. Zaal Kikvidze |
Date Deposited: | 16 Apr 2015 06:11 |
Last Modified: | 16 Apr 2015 06:11 |
URI: | http://eprints.iliauni.edu.ge/id/eprint/2061 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Don’t diss integration: a comment on Ricklefs’s disintegrating communities. (deposited 22 Jan 2014 14:34)
- Don’t diss integration: a comment on Ricklefs’s disintegrating communities. (deposited 16 Apr 2015 06:11) [Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |